🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.